[Baren]: The mailing list / discussion forum for woodblock printmaking. Baren Digest Friday, 4 December 1998 Volume 05 : Number 363 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Don Furst Date: Thu, 03 Dec 1998 10:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Baren 2241] Re: Expressions Graphics Small Print Show Congratulations to April Vollmer! I just received my Winter 98 issue of the English journal Printmaking Today, which this time is focusing on relief printmaking. April has a handsome two-page spread, complete with a color reproduction, in which she succinctly and clearly describes her work in "moku hanga." Well done! ------------------------------ From: "Roger A. Ball" Date: Thu, 03 Dec 1998 09:05:35 -0700 Subject: [Baren 2242] Record keeping Dave said, >for ten years now, I know how many sheets >of paper I've bought, how many were used for each print, to which >collector each print was sent, when it was sent, when it was paid for ... Well, I'm at a point of wondering about this. I used to track everything this closely as well--it drove me *$(&@#! nuts keeping it up. I decided to hell with record keeping entirely except cost/profit. To think that it will matter 10 years from now who got print #3 of the second run of woodcut 'x' seems silly when the upkeep of such records would vex Job. Are there reasons that this kind of data would help down the line that I'm not seeing?? --I will say I'm very in favor of tracking the profitability of the endeavor, however. Is everyone else tracking each and every bleeding print? I'm also about to decide to _not_ number my prints. Some of my thoughts: record-keeping, yes--but also stuff like, the false sense any numbering scheme gives the collectors or the fact that the bottom number is an artificial limit or goal. I mean, you and I know that #1 of 20 is probably not better than #13 but collectors have different ideas. Anybody out there just use a _single_ number? At this point I guess that seems more appealing than a) no number or b) a # of a #. I do have such a number (the true print # in order from the start) already in pencil on the back upper corner of every print...I guess I could use that to track even if I don't number on the front. Your thoughts/rants? Just got my paper/brushes/pigments from Dan Smith. Finishing CARVING the last block of five over the next few days. Doubt I'll get to proof even by this weekend, though. We'll see. Cheers fer now, - -Roger http://www.inquo.net/~beckorro/woodcut/woodcut.htm ------------------------------ From: Elizabeth Atwood Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 11:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Baren 2243] Record keeping Thanks to Graham and David for the info on record keeping. This is one area of knowledge that has always been in short supply for artists. My records predate the use of the computer.......I have always kept a large card file....with several checking account books to cover the monetary history. My many other records I have been keeping on the Claris works....but suspiciously convert everything to disk. Question for Graham....could one switch over to the new Appleworks without redoing their files.......did you do that?..... ElizAtwood ------------------------------ From: Graham Scholes Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 09:54:51 -0800 Subject: [Baren 2244] Re: Record keeping .ElizAtwood wrote.... >Question for Graham....could one switch over to the new Appleworks without >redoing their files.......did you do that?.... What are you switch over from.....? Graham ------------------------------ From: Graham Scholes Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 09:59:57 -0800 Subject: [Baren 2245] Re: Record keeping ElizAtwood wrote.... >Question for Graham....could one switch over to the new Appleworks without >redoing their files.......did you do that?..... AND I did not read your posting when I sent the first e-mail. Sorry about that.. Yes you can easily open a ClarisWorks with AppleWorks. Fundamentally the same program with more tots and whistles.... Open Appleworks and then open your document. Presto..... Have fun. Graham Take care of the means........... and the end will take care of itself. ------------------------------ From: David Bull Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 10:00:46 +0900 Subject: [Baren 2246] Re: Record Keeping Roger asked - re record keeping: > Are there reasons that this kind of data would help > down the line that I'm not seeing?? I have two reasons (aside from whatever personality 'quirks' that make me want to keep things orderly ...). The first is the legal requirement - to keep 'adequate' records for tax purposes. I operate as a proprietorship, and am legally bound to maintain fairly detailed records. The tax people don't care 'who got print #3 of the second run of woodcut 'x'', but they _do_ want to be able to see that the number of prints that I have declared sold sort of matches up with the amount of supplies that I buy. Self-employed people like myself are well-known here as being the worst kind of tax evaders, and I want to make very sure that I keep things clean and straight. The second reason is more general. Good record keeping is part and parcel of running an organized (and successful) business. I mentioned some figures in my previous posting (prices down 40%, costs down 50%, etc.) and those numbers were not just randomly plucked out of the air. I have spent many hours poring over spreadsheets, trying to balance projected income/expense calculations. Without good and detailed records of my past activity, I would be completely at sea for projecting future plans. I know that my washi cost was 8.96% of last year's income, postage costs were 4.11%, part time workers ran at 7.82%, the newsletter accounted for 4.67%, etc.etc. With this sort of data on hand, I can make sensible plans for the coming year. Yes, it's sometimes a bit troublesome, but everytime I start to grumble to myself about it, I remind myself that this is a very small price to pay for the personal freedom I enjoy - getting up in the morning (_every_ morning!) and not having to go out to a job. Dave P.S. Don wrote about: > the Winter 98 issue of the English journal Printmaking Today Don or April, Can we see this 'on-line' anywhere? ------------------------------ End of Baren Digest V5 #363 ***************************