Baren Digest Tuesday, 19 February 2002 Volume 18 : Number 1727 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Graham Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:52:44 -0800 Subject: [Baren 17045] Soft?Hard? Jack wrote..... > It doesn't work that we all get to make up our >own classification systems, unless we keep it to ourselves, to avoid >confusion. You have homed in on the matter beautifully. My concern with this discussion of Mike stating that Basswood was a hard wood, would cause confusion in the minds of some members, particularly the ones new to the sport. A couple personal postings clearly indicated this to me. This forum is a learning and educational venue and to have feed back based on category rather than facts as related to soft/hard woods can very misguiding to the folks. Graham ------------------------------ From: "Jeanne N. Chase" Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:15:37 -0500 Subject: [Baren 17046] Re: RE; Presses Dear Dean Thanking you for the gift certificate. It is sooo nice of you and the Baren folk to think of me. Since I am working in a teeny tiny garage and have absolutely no space except for my new drafting table and a small work table. Is it ok if I wait upon the gift certificate until I relocate in a new studio? We are trying to persuade the County to give the stamp of approval on the rebuilding of my burnt out studio, and that may take awhile. The wheels of progress are pretty slow around here. I am still overwhelmed by all the generosity shown by everyone. And I could easily select some supplies now, but have nowhere to put them. Ok, if I order later? Thanks Jeanne Norman Chase ------------------------------ From: GraphChem@aol.com Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:36:11 EST Subject: [Baren 17047] Re: RE; Presses Hi Jeanne, I'm taking the liberty of answering for Dean as he's been out most of the day. You can use the certificate whenever you like. There's no hurry or deadline. Hope all is coming together for you. I can't imagine the re-building process. Let us know when you want to do something. Best regards, Susan ------------------------------ From: Graham Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 14:21:04 -0800 Subject: [Baren 17048] Re: Hardwoods/Softwood. I am afraid that I won't be much help, as inexpensive and good are kinda at the opposite end of the spectrum. The way I would approach the problem is the give a priority to one factor and let the other take a lesser importants. Let me explain. If the design/image is critical and detail and fineness is important then the best wood for the job is a 3' x 5' piece of Shina plywood usable both sides, from Noboru Sawai in Vancouver. Cost ... about $190.00 Can. $110.00 US+ shipping. This stuff cuts beautifully and is the best available. If there is a looseness in the design and some splintering is not going to spoil the final appearance and you like sharpening chisels, then there is a Baltic birch that come in 5' x 5' in 3/4" or 1/2" and 3/8" (made in Russia by the way) that would work fairly good. It is $35.00 Can.... about 23.00 US (1/2" thickness) There is another plus with the Birch plywood.... when you get finished= carving that size of plate, you will have arms like a gorilla. I sure hopes this helps. Shout if you have any questions. Regards Graham >Hello Graham - I appreciate your knowledge and sharing so much - I am new to wood - I've done one with all shina from Mcclain's -=3D it was wee. A printmaking friend of mine just printed a 3 foot X5 foot (2 actually) woodcut - monocolor on a french broad(sic) press. We all pitched in to heft these things around. he printed them face down. Had to pull 3 images before they were really up and alas the bottom third of the prints were ricey. Our professor thinks the french press has been used for so many small prints ( it is the graduate press) usually 18X24, that the press bed (stainless steel) is warped and won't print all the way on something so large - the press is at least 20 years old and been through many a grad. There is a point to this and that is that jeff used regular old plywood that you get at home depot. He used expensive Japanese tools and regularly sharpened them but had many a "hangnail" if you will with rips along the line. He said that was what he could afford - do you have a reccomendation for something inexpensive but that you don't have to fight and repair with bondo. Diane ------------------------------ From: Graham Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 14:37:34 -0800 Subject: [Baren 17049] Re: RE; Presses I have been racking my brains as to what to send you that would be useful and yet out of the ordinary. Could I send you the hori dai that I designed. Sure fantastic for ones posture and makes carving really easy.... well easier. Go looky lou at http://www.woodblock.info/bootcamp/hori-dai.html Sincerely, Graham >Dear Dean > >Thanking you for the gift certificate. It is sooo nice of you and the Baren folk to think of me. > >Since I am working in a teeny tiny garage and have absolutely no space except >for my new drafting table and a small work table. Is it ok if I wait upon the >gift certificate until I relocate in a new studio? > We are trying to persuade the County to give the stamp of approval on the rebuilding of my burnt out studio, and that may take awhile. > The wheels of progress are pretty slow around here. > >I am still overwhelmed by all the generosity shown by everyone. > And I could easily select some supplies now, but have nowhere to put them. > >Ok, if I order later? > >Thanks >Jeanne Norman Chase ------------------------------ From: FurryPressII@aol.com Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:11:46 EST Subject: [Baren 17050] Re: Say it loud: I like pine and I'm proud! FORGOT WALNUT THAT IS FUN TO CARVE AND "PURTY" TOO ------------------------------ From: Jack Reisland Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 14:15:35 -1000 Subject: [Baren 17051] Re: Soft?Hard? Unless I am mistaken, Mike stated that basswood is classified as a "hardwood", not a "hard wood", as you stated. There is a very big difference, and thus the apparent confusion. "Hard wood" is any wood that you deem, in any subjective manner, to be "hard". "Hardwood" is a specifically recognized term in the forestry and lumber industry used to describe wood from a broad-leafed tree or the tree itself. That little space between the words, or lack of it, may seem like a trifling matter, but such is the nature of our language. It may not seem important, but if we are communicating with people in the wood use vocations, it is best to use the industry recognized definitions. Jack Graham wrote: > You have homed in on the matter beautifully. > My concern with this discussion of Mike stating that Basswood was > a hard wood, would cause confusion in the minds of some members, > particularly the ones new to the sport. A couple personal postings > clearly indicated this to me. ------------------------------ From: "Maria Arango" Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:35:17 -0800 Subject: [Baren 17052] Re: Soft?Hard?Easy?Best? And while we are at it, for those poor confused "new to the sport" babes, there is no such thing as best or worst. As Jim, Jack and John have stated (I just like to say J-names) there are preferences. What is easy for some may be difficult for others. The "best" wood as opined by someone is practice garbage to another. Experimenting is the key. I for one fail to see what is so difficult about starting on birch. In my experience--not influenced by any master printers whose names are undoubtedly going to be dropped casually into the conversation very soon--birch is a piece of cake and a bit of honing while carving is all that is needed to cut painlessly. It is readily available everywhere and cheap. As for a muscle building exercise, digging a ditch is much better. Cherry is a bit tougher but again, with sharply honed tools, not out of bounds even for the beginner. There are no painless woods, they all have their wonderful little quirks. Plank maple is deliciously easy to carve despite being a hardwood hard wood ha rd wo od. Sharp tools (or should I say sharptools?) are a must no matter what w o o d you choose. I would highly recommend trying out every piece of scrap stuff mentioned (including non-wood matters) because it's fun and that's what we do, we carve stuff. Anyhow, get cuttin' Maria <><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Maria Arango Las Vegas, Nevada, USA http://www.1000woodcuts.com maria@mariarango.com <><><><><><><><><><><><><><> ------------------------------ From: Jack Reisland Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:50:52 -1000 Subject: [Baren 17053] Re: Soft?Hard?Easy?Best? As usual, Maria has cut to the point. Instead of worrying about different woods, it is much more worth while to practice sharpening your tools. Once you know how to sharpen, and can do it quickly, many different woods seem friendly. If you can't maintain sharp tools, all woods will seem to be working against you. Jack R. Maria Arango wrote: > And while we are at it, for those poor confused "new to the sport" babes, > there is no such thing as best or worst. ------------------------------ From: Graham Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 22:41:25 -0800 Subject: [Baren 17054] Never again.... Not really Baren stuff, but I promise it can NEVER be mentioned again. At 8.02pm on February 20 this year it will be a historic moment in time. It will not be marked by the ringing of bells, the banging of drums, or spectacular fireworks displays but at that precise time, on that specific date, something will happen which has not occurred for 1,001 years and will never happen again. As the clock ticks over from 8.01pm to 8.02pm on Wednesday, February 20, time will, for sixty seconds only, read in perfect symmetry 2002, 2002,2002, or to be more precise, 20:02, 20/02, 2002. The last occasion that time read in such a symmetrical pattern was long before the days of the digital watch and the 24-hour clock. It was at 10.01am on January 10, 1001. And because the clock only goes up to 23.59, it is something that will never happen again. Graham ------------------------------ From: David Bull Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:55:33 +0900 Subject: [Baren 17055] Exchange #11 web pages open ... It has taken a few days, but after receiving the images of Exchange #11 prints from Mike Lyon, I have been able to get the web pages ready ... Head to: http://barenforum.org ... and take the link to the 'Exchange Gallery'. Might be worth reminding everybody again just how those pages work. Each print is shown as a relatively small image, but clicking it will bring up a popup window with a larger version. _Don't_ close that extra window, but keep it open at the side of your desktop. Then click back over to the list of names to pick the next person's print to view. Each time you click a small image to see an enlargement, it will open into that _same_ window, so you don't have to be constantly opening/closing browser windows ... Also please note that when you scroll down below the small image, you will see a feedback form. This is a 'direct line' directly from you to that artist - whatever you enter on that form will be sent by email to the artist, and will not be seen by anybody else. The idea is to encourage constructive criticism, but without many of the problems that arise with making comments publicly on the forum ... Sorry that this is all happening so late - the Exchange #12 deadline is upon us too; we'll try to get those prints up without so much delay! Dave ------------------------------ From: "Wilson Harvey" Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:09:49 -0000 Subject: [Baren 17056] smudges & MDF Hi. As a newcomer to Baren from the UK (any other Brits in it?), let me congratulate you on an excellent site. I recently started woodcuts after a lifetime of ink & watercolour painting and have got hooked! Having made a mess of some pine (a bad choice to start with!) I've had good success with MDF, using it with water-based inks with no particular problems with swelling etc. As far as smudges, fingerprints etc on the print edges, I've found a cure that seems to work well for me: I cut a mat to the size of the paper and a cut hole in it the exact size of the wood block. I then tape the mat to the paper (bevel to paper-side), and use this to ensure exact registration onto the paper, and it also shields the paper from grubby hands. After printing, just remove the mat. If I've just reinvented the wheel here, please forgive me! Wil Harvey N. Yorkshire, UK ------------------------------ From: Dan Dew Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 07:17:21 -0500 Subject: [Baren 17057] Query I was asked yesterday by a friend: "How do you know what to carve away"? After my usual quick and flippant answer, I stopped to think about it. Sometimes it's technical, sometimes it's a feeling that this is right, but now I'm curious as to what others would say. What say the group? **************************** Daniel L. Dew ddew0001@tampabay.rr.com ddew@tampabay.rr.com http://www.dandew.com **************************** ------------------------------ From: John and Jan Telfer Date: Tue, 19 Feb 02 20:33:34 -0000 Subject: [Baren 17058] Re: Cuttlefish bones Ld, re Cuttlefish bones.... >All that talk of smudgy spots on the print margins last week got me to >>thinking.... >>A trick my highschool art teacher taught me a gajillion years ago. >>You can rub a good deal of smudging and spots from paper margins with >>cuttlefish bone. I didn't know that. I am a clean worker anyway, but I can certainly pass on that information to my printmaking collegues. Western Australian beaches abound in cuttlefish shells...you can be really "picky" and leave the broken ones and just pick up the "perfect" ones. The fresher chalk would be more effective than older sundried ones to use as an eraser. I have a big plastic bag full of them in my shed. Carving the "chalk" makes nice little stamp shapes as well, or moulds for pouring silver jewellery shapes. The budgerigars and caged birds love them for keeping their beaks shaped. In Australia cuttlefish shells abound! Thanks Ld, Jan ------------------------------ End of Baren Digest V18 #1727 *****************************